Thinking “allelopathy” and “phenology” to enhance ecological restoration success: the case of Upper Rhin floodplain projects
Isabelle Combroux  1@  , Cybill Staentzel@
1 : Laboratoire Image, Ville, Environnement  (UMR 7362-LIVE)
université de Strasbourg, CNRS : UMR7362
Institut de Botanique – Université de Strasbourg- 28 rue Goethe, 67083 Strasbourg -  France

Many ecological restorations projects were developed in major floodplains within the last decades. Most of these projects consisted civil engineering works and usually aimed to increase sites connectivity. However they create a large amount of bare soil surfaces thus dramatically increasing the restored site's invisibility. In order to avoid massive colonization of restored sites by invasive plants, stakeholders should thus develop new ecological restoration methods to enhance biotic resistance of restored communities and therefore prevent invasions.

We here present some study cases where community biotic resistance was enhanced through several methods: (i) Macrophytes transfer and (ii) Soil propagule bank transfert, both methods as a way to enable a quick colonization and/or limit the invasions, through the settle down of biotic interactions (allelopathy, competition); and (iii) a temporary disconnection to connect restored sites with potential invasive plants' sources when these plant' invasiveness is lower due to their phenology.

In the first studies a former gravel pit was restored in North East of Alsace by the creation of shallow water zones on the edge of the gravel pit that is already covered by invasive plant species.

The second study concerned the recreation of a channels' systems whithin the Rhine floodplain.

Our results suggest that the transfer of a local species that may develop negative allelopathic effects on invasive species together with a timing of restoration in accordance with the species (local and invasive) phenology could enhance ecological restoration success.


Online user: 1 RSS Feed